🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed decision, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to employ a newly configured congressional map that is projected to include up to five new Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three decision, handed down on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to overturn a district court's injunction that had invalidated the new map in November.

Court's Explanation

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating much confusion and upsetting the fine equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in explaining its ruling.

That lower court had determined that Texas had likely grouped voters based on their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the boundaries. It had mandated the state to revert to the maps created after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

Through a forcefully written dissent, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's action. She argued that it undermined the work of the district court, noting that its opinion was written by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan wrote in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, unjustly, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a infraction of the law of the land.

Countrywide Redistricting Fight

This decision comes amid a nationwide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican hold. Ordinarily, boundary revision takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that could add a number of additional conservative seats. The opposition, for their part, have responded with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State attorney general hailed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order protected Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees representation supportive of Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

Conversely, opposition party officials decried the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A leading House figure argued the court had yet again shredded its legitimacy by upholding a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.