🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our kids' youth". Legislation may be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "one of the options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to enact a bill raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged parents to block their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory statement calling for a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the move does not enact binding law.

"A clear age limit is a good first step," stated the European lawmaker behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "supported by strong data".

Last year, interest grew behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. One foundation founded by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after encountering dangerous social media material suggests that a simple age ban might not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to create tools that are safe and fit for young users," said a influential peer.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, legislation is primarily unfolding at the local level amid national gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional use needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills mandating guardian approval for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various individuals to mimic the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Outside of these regions, further countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more measured position. A major UN agency has warned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in safety.

While this global debate unfolds, the actions of Australia and others demonstrate that states internationally are no longer prepared to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.